TRENDING:

WALSH: Explaining Progressive Gender Theory To Right Wi...
Air Force Deploys New Weapon To Deal With Iran, North K...
A Brewing Rebellion in Seattle
CauseACTION Clarion
  • Clarion Frontpage
  • CauseACTION Home - Rants, Reads, Tools and Videos
    • Rich's Rants
    • Rich's Reads
    • Rich's Videos
  • Publishers
        • AllsidesAllsides News
        • Epoch TimesEpoch Times US Feed https://www.theepochtimes.com/c-us-news/feed
        • Just The NewsJust The News
        • PowerLine BlogPowerLine Blog https://www.powerlineblog.com/feed
        • Rush LimbaughRush Limbaugh
        • The Gateway Pundit
        • World Net DailyWorld Net Daily Newsfeed
        • Bongino ReportThe Bongino Report
        • Daily WireDaily Wire rss feed https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml
        • Michelle MalkinMichelle Malkin
        • One America News Network
        • Sean HannitySean Hannity
        • The HillThe Hill
        • Breitbart NewsBreitbart News
        • Newsmax NewsfrontNewsmax Newsfront
        • Gab TrendsGab Trends
        • PJ MediaPJ Media
        • The Babylon BeeThe Babylon Bee
        • The Liberty DailyThe Liberty Daily
        • Citizen Free PressCitizen Free Press
        • Hot AirHot Air newsfeed
        • NOQ ReportNOQ Report
        • PragerUPragerU video feed https://www.prageru.com/rss.xml
        • The BlazeThe Blaze
        • TwitchyTwitchy
        • The FederalistFederalist News Feed
        • The Right Scoop
  • CauseACTION's Trusted Conservative Campaigns
    • The House Freedom Fund
  • The Fine Print
    • Privacy Policy
    • Affiliate Earnings Disclosure

Select Page

Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe

Posted by -NO AUTHOR- | Apr 30, 2019 | Drudge Report | 0 |


UP NEXT

UP NEXT

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

The letter and a subsequent phone call between the two men reveal the degree to which the longtime colleagues and friends disagreed as they handled the legally and politically fraught task of investigating the president. Democrats in Congress are likely to scrutinize Mueller’s complaints to Barr as they contemplate the prospect of opening impeachment proceedings and mull how hard to press for Mueller himself to testify publicly.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

At the time Mueller’s letter was sent to Barr on March 27, Barr had days prior announced that Mueller did not find a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. In his memo to Congress, Barr also said that Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but that Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge. 

Days after Barr’s announcement, Mueller wrote the previously undisclosed private letter to the Justice Department, laying out his concerns in stark terms that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

The letter made a key request: that Barr release the 448-page report’s introductions and executive summaries, and it made initial suggested redactions for doing so, according to Justice Department officials.



Robert Mueller wearing a suit and tie: Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III submitted his investigation to the Justice Department in March.


© Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III submitted his investigation to the Justice Department in March.

A spokesman for Mueller declined to comment.

Justice Department officials said Tuesday that they were taken aback by the tone of Mueller’s letter and that it came as a surprise to them that he had such concerns. Until they received the letter, they believed Mueller was in agreement with them on the process of reviewing the report and redacting certain types of information, a process that took several weeks. Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.

In his letter to Barr, Mueller wrote that the redaction process “need not delay release of the enclosed materials. Release at this time would alleviate the misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional and public questions about the nature and outcome of our investigation.”

Barr is scheduled to appear Wednesday morning before the Senate Judiciary Committee — a much-anticipated public confrontation between the nation’s top law enforcement official and Democratic lawmakers, where he is likely to be questioned at length about his interactions with Mueller.

A day after Mueller sent his letter to Barr, the two men spoke by phone for about 15 minutes, according to law enforcement officials.

In that call, Mueller said he was concerned that media coverage of the obstruction investigation was misguided and creating public misunderstandings about the office’s work, according to Justice Department officials. Mueller did not express similar concerns about the public discussion of the investigation of Russia’s election interference, the officials said.

When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.

In their call, Barr also took issue with Mueller calling his memo a “summary,” saying he had never intended to summarize the voluminous report, but instead provide an account of its top conclusions, officials said.

Justice Department officials said that, in some ways, the phone conversation was more cordial than the letter that preceded it, but that the two men did express some differences of opinion about how to proceed.