It was now-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok who infamously promised his paramour back in the day that he would not let Donald Trump win the presidency.
“We’ll stop it,” he promised, before the 2016 election.
That didn’t turn out so well, as Trump did, in fact, win the election, Strzok was investigated and fired, and now both a federal prosecutor and the chief of the FBI are looking into whether there should be additional charges over that whole episode.
The “stop Trump” agenda has, in fact, involved even Republicans, with some of the more notable participants being Joe Scarborough and George Will.
It’s been a virtual epidemic in Hollywood, where personalities like Michael Moore have issued their demands.
Now it is actress Alyssa Milano who says she will not let Trump win, in 2020
The activist who has worked on behalf of sex strikes, AIDS, PETA, dogs and more, said recently on social media, “My plan for 2020 involves raising money for grassroots organizations in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. These are the states we lost by 77k votes in 2016. I will not allow that to happen again.”
Then she included a link asking others to pay for her agenda.
Milano has had roles in “Who’s the Boss?” “Melrose Place” and “Charmed,” has been in show business since she was 7 and got her start with a tour of “Annie.”
Twitter social media aggregator Twitchy warned, “She will not allow it to happen again.”
And the Hollywood Reporter said the groups that Milano intends to benefit are Detroit Action, Michigan Liberation, Mothering Justice Action Fund, 215 People’s Alliance, Pennsylvania Stands Up, Pennsylvania Student Power Network, Black Leaders Organizing Communities, Leaders Igniting Transformation Action Fund and Voces de la Frontera Action.”
Milano claimed, “These organizations empower youth, immigrants, women, people of color and communities facing the worst of Republicans’ horrible policies.”
And she added another pitch for others to fund her campaign.
Twitchy said, “This is how you win? Are you famliiar with Alyssa Milano’s record? Donald Trump should probably just get it over with and send her the thank-you card and chocolates right now.”
It was just months ago that talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh explained what’s behind some of the major political developments of the past two years.
The Mueller investigation, the opposition to President Trump’s judicial nominees, the fight over allowing illegal aliens an open door to the United States and others.
It’s simply that the Democrats have been dedicated since Trump’s election to stop him and his agenda, Limbaugh said.
“It has basically been a Deep State plot to prevent Donald Trump from being Donald Trump, to prevent Donald Trump from having any kind of success with his agenda at all, with the added bonus being that along the way they can create the idea that Trump stole something like an election or is a thug-criminal and bad guy,” he said.
WND columnist Michael Brown said Milano’s arguments aren’t always reliable.
“Actress Alyssa Milano has now marshaled the Bible and science to support her pro-abortion position. Unfortunately, she is wrong on both accounts. The Bible and science, rightly understood, are totally pro-life,” he wrote recently.
Tweeting on April 1 (with no apparent irony intended), Milano said, “I love God. I believe in God.
“But I don’t believe my personal beliefs of which we can’t confirm should override scientific facts and what we can confirm.
“‘If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how can you believe if I tell you heavenly things?’ John 3:12”
Brown wrote, “As for Milano’s love for God and belief in God, that is between her and God. At least she is not denying His existence. That’s a step in the right direction.
“As for her quoting the Bible, the words are taken out of context and, in reality, work against her – though I’m glad that she feels that quoting the Bible is important. We agree!”
He said, “It’s just that she could not have chosen two worse witnesses to defend the ‘right’ of abortion. To repeat: both the Bible and science, rightly understood, are pro-life.”
Brown explained the multiple times the Bible references the unborn, and talks of their humanity.
Then he writes, “Does science teach that the baby in the womb is simply a clump of cells or a mass of tissue? Does it teach that the unborn child is not human until it leaves the womb? That it does not have a beating heart? That it does not have unique DNA? That it cannot feel pain (at a certain point of development)? That it can be tossed aside for any and every reason?”
“What ‘scientific facts’ support abortion? Can anyone name one?”