More stunning than the Washington Post’s admission this week that its report from two months ago that seriously hurt President Trump’s arguments about vote fraud in Georgia, and was used in the Democrats’ second failed impeach-and-remove campaign, was made up is the fact that other legacy media outlets “confirmed” the report through their own “sources.”
That’s the conclusion delivered by commentator Becket Adams at the Washington Examiner.
He explains, “It’s one thing if a single news outlet publishes a fraudulent anonymously sourced ‘scoop.’ It’s another thing entirely if multiple newsrooms claim they independently ‘confirmed’ the fraudulent ‘scoop’ with anonymous sources of their own.”
The issue is that, two months after its story helped fuel House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s most recent failed impeach-and-remove campaign against President Trump, the Post admitted Monday it wrongly attributed quotes to Trump in a phone call with a Georgia election official.
In its January report, the Post reported Trump told the official in Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office, Frances Watson, to “find the fraud” in the 2020 election result and that she would be a “national hero” if she succeeded.
But a recording of the Dec. 23 call released last week by the Wall Street Journal tells a different story. Trump said Watson would be “praised” when the “right answer comes out.” He encouraged her to review mail-in ballots in the Democratic stronghold of Fulton County.
Watson replied to Trump: “I can assure you that our team and the (state investigators), that we are only interested in the truth and finding the information that is based on the facts.”
Georgia was one of several states where there appeared circumstances that suggested vote fraud in the 2020 election. All of those states eventually were awarded to Joe Biden.
Can any major national news agency be trusted?
0% (0 Votes)
0% (0 Votes)
But the Post now has admitted the statements it attributed to Trump were made up:
— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) March 15, 2021
The Post’s disaster “can reasonably be explained away as a simple error,” Adams wrote.
But what about the others who claimed to have confirmed that?
Adams explained, “If you can believe it, the Washington Post bungling its ‘bombshell’ report isn’t the most scandalous thing about this episode in media malfeasance. No, the most scandalous thing is: Several newsrooms claimed they independently ‘confirmed’ the most damning details of the Washington Post’s since-corrected ‘scoop.'”
He noted NBC News said it “confirmed The Post’s characterization of the Dec. 23 call through a source familiar with the conversation.” And USA Today claimed a “Georgia official speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters confirmed the details of the call.” And ABC News claimed: “President Donald Trump phoned a chief investigator in Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office asking the official to ‘find the fraud’ and telling this person they would be a ‘national hero’ for it, an individual familiar with the matter confirmed to ABC News.” And PBS NewsHour and CNN “likewise seemingly claimed they independently ‘confirmed’ the story through their own anonymous sources.”
Adams wrote, “The uncomfortable questions we are left with now are: To whom did these news outlets speak? How did the source or sources get the details of the phone call wrong? Are there additional examples of the media reporting bad information provided by anonymous sources we don’t know about, merely because there’s no contradictory audio or video? Just how many anonymously sourced stories are not true? If it can happen this easily, who is to say it doesn’t happen often? Further, how many of these bogus stories have enjoyed the backing of supposed independent corroboration when, in fact, newsrooms most likely talked to the same person or people?”
He pointedly asked: “How does one ‘confirm’ something that is not true?”
INBOX: Trump statement on Washington Post correction: pic.twitter.com/vTcKSI1gEN
— Henry Rodgers (@henryrodgersdc) March 15, 2021
Trump’s reaction to the Post’s correction was gratitude for the fact the record was set straight.
But he also charged that much more needs to be addressed:
“The Washington Post just issued a correction as to the contents of the incorrectly reported phone call I had with respect to voter fraud in the Great State of Georgia. While I appreciate the Washington Post’s correction, which immediately makes the Georgia Witch Hunt a non-story, the original story was a Hoax, right from the very beginning. I would further appreciate a strong investigation into Fulton County, Georgia, and the Stacey Abrams political machine which, I believe, would totally change the course of the president election in Georgia,” he wrote in an online posting.
“Fulton County has not been properly audited for vote or signature verification. They only looked at areas of the State where there most likely would be few problems, and ever there they found large numbers of mistakes. We are seeking to find and reveal the large-scale election fraud which took place in Georgia. Many residents agree, and their anger caused them not to turn out and vote for two Republican Senators in the January election.
“The Consent Decree signed between Raffensperger and Stacey Abrams was not approved by the Georgia State Legislature, and therefore should be deemed invalid, and the election result changed. Why the Governor and Raffensperger ever approved this Consent Degree is one of the great questions? We look forward to an answer.
“You will notice that establishment media errors, omissions, mistakes, and outright lies always slant one way – against me and against Republicans. Meanwhile, stories that hurt Democrats or undermine their narratives are buried, ignored, or delayed until they can do the least harm – for example, after an election is over. Look no further than the negative coverage of the vaccine that preceded the election and the overdue celebration of the vaccine once the election had concluded. A strong democracy requires a fair and honest press. This latest media travesty underscores that legacy media outlets should be regarded as political entities – not journalistic enterprises. In any event, I thank the Washington Post for the correction.
you all are missing the real story re: WaPo’s correction of its Trump/Ga. investigations chief “scoop.”
the real scandal is that a bunch of newsrooms claimed at the time they “confirmed” the details of the “scoop” with their own anon sourcing.https://t.co/4Xqxt3mcHk
— tsar becket adams (@BecketAdams) March 15, 2021
During the failed impeachment trial in January, Democrats used the false quotes in the Post story to make their case. An impeachment manager contended Trump was “asking the official to say there was evidence of fraud when there wasn’t any.”
FLASHBACK: Democrats used the fake Washington Post “find the fraud” quote that was retracted today in the Trump impeachment trial
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) March 15, 2021
Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].