http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/K_NrYkv1_Io/a-swastika-on-a-bathroom-wall-what-could-it-possibly-mean.php

Anti-semitic graffiti has popped up at American University in Washington, D.C. It was discovered in a dormitory bathroom. The graffiti consisted of a swastika, a pair of SS lightning bolts, and a Star of David crossed out with an “X.”

This sort of thing is offensive, obviously. However, on a campus the size of AU in a city the size of D.C., it’s not surprising that racist and/or anti-semitic graffiti appears from time to time. We’ll never be able to stamp it out. And as long as no one is being physically attacked because of race or religion, I don’t consider offensive graffiti cause for serious alarm.

The response of American University troubles me, however. When school officials notified students of the graffiti, about a week after it was discovered, the email said there were reports of “possible” anti-semitic drawings.

“Possible”? A swastika and a crossed out Star of David?

As one student complained, if these drawings are possible anti-semitism, what does blatant anti-semitism look like?

Imagine a noose being found in the same bathroom. Would the AU administration call this “possible anti-Black racism”? Of course not. Yet, it deemed the most obvious symbols of hatred against Jews possible anti-semitism.

AU’s president, Sylvia Burwell (Secretary of Health and Human Services under President Obama) explained that she wanted to be “cautious” in her communication because the investigation of the graffiti was in its early stage. I guess she didn’t want to rule out the possibility that ten million monkeys with markers had descended on campus and one of them had randomly drawn a swastika, a SS symbol, and a crossed-out Star of David.

Digging the hole deeper, Burwell said, “Regardless of the intent of those responsible for the graffiti, its existence caused pain and trauma for members of our community.” Apparently, she still hasn’t figured out the intent behind drawing a swastika.

The problem with the graffiti isn’t that it “caused pain and trauma” for AU students. These days, almost anything — the election of a Republican president, a picture of Thomas Jefferson, a woman being called “her” — can cause pain and trauma in students.

The problem with the graffiti is that it’s blatantly anti-semitic. But a former U.S. cabinet member hasn’t worked that out — or pretends she hasn’t, for some reason.

Strange, unsettling times.

You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...