Three-quarters of local elections officials and staff who responded to a nationwide survey say the federal government is not doing enough to support their needs or protect them from a rising tide of threats in the wake of the 2020 elections.

That perceived lack of support and fears of “false political attacks on the election system” is why at least 20 percent of locally elected elections officials and professional staff plan to leave their posts before the 2024 election, according to a survey released this month by the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.

The center canvassed 596 of roughly 9,250 local election officials nationwide between late January and mid-February.

Of those who responded, 71 percent said the federal government must do more than launch a U.S. Department of Justice task force to investigate threats against local election officials to protect them; 42 percent said they weren’t aware of the task force even existed.

A Michigan elections worker is seen in a November 2020 file photo. (Elaine Cromie/Getty Images)

Half the respondents said their states must do more to boost election worker security and about a quarter said local governments, counties specifically, also must step up protections for elections officials and staff.

About 20 percent of survey respondents said they are “very unlikely” or “somewhat unlikely” to continue serving through 2024, citing political attacks on the system, stress, and retirement plans as primary reasons for leaving sooner than previously planned.

Florida State Association of Supervisors of Elections (FSASE) President Wesley Wilcox said that the 20 percent attrition forecast may be conservative.

In Florida, the state’s 67 county elections supervisors are elected every four years. Most now serving were elected in 2020, Wilcox said, and already one has resigned and others have made it “crystal clear” they will not seek reelection in 2024.

“As soon as we get past the midterms, I think we will see a flood of others” resigning from posts or opting not to seek reelection in November, he said.

“I would not be shocked to see 25 percent” attrition, not only among elected supervisors, Wilcox said, but among administrative workers who man county elections offices.

“When you think about it, this is the front-line staff that unfortunately takes a public beating” as nonpartisan bystanders in the crossfire of heated post-2020 election politics, he said.

While 30 percent of survey respondents who plan to leave their positions cited “stress associated with the job” as the primary motivator, another 29 percent said they were retiring as planned.

“Some of this attrition is retirement. Some have been there for a long time and it is just time for them to go,” the Election Center executive director Tim Mattice said Thursday, gauging Brennan Center’s 20 percent attrition forecast as an accurate assessment.

Epoch Times Photo
A file photo shows election workers processing ballots (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

The “incredible experience in running an election—a presidential election, no less—during a pandemic” was demanding and exhausting for elections workers, but “additional pressures” have mounted since 2020, he said.

The 2020 election was “something they had never experienced before. That certainly would be a motivator for some folks to say, ‘Hey, maybe it’s time for me to step aside,’” Mattice said.

“It’s definitely been a different type of environment” since 2020.

The Elections Center is operated by the National Association of Elections Officers, based in Katy, Texas. The nonprofit, which represents more than 1,350 members in 44 states, has joined other groups in calling on federal and state governments to take threats against elected officials and administrative professionals seriously.

The National Association of State Election Directors (NASED), which represents state elections officials and staff in all 50 states from its Washington, D.C., headquarters, is demanding Congress address an “unacceptable” wave of “threats, harassment and intimidation” directed at elections workers “for doing their jobs.”

Epoch Times Photo
Election workers count ballots in Philadelphia, Penn., on Nov. 4, 2020. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

The Election Official Legal Defense Network, operated by Washington, DC-based Center for Election Innovation and Research, is providing pro-bono legal help to election workers and calling for more state and federal prosecutors dedicated to addressing what it calls “domestic terrorism.”

They point to a 2022 bill adopted by Oregon legislators that makes it a crime to harass an election official, punishable by up to a year in jail and a possible $6,250 fine, as an example of legislation other states should replicate.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, lawmakers in at least eight states have introduced bills during 2022 to better protect election workers and more harshly punish offenders.

Wilcox said local elections workers need federal protections because threats are rarely from local constituents.

“We in Florida, we get people from Illinois or Missouri who have heard something, call attempting to berate us. We are having challenges there,” he said.

“I don’t know what you could do. We need to sit down and have some serious conversations about what are some good measures to put in place to ensure not only the physical and mental safety of our elections officials and personnel but also the safety of our democracy.”

The attacks get personal, Wilcox said.

“There needs to be a better way, or at least a more punitive way, to get people who are just maliciously fabricating stories and stuff,” he said.

“Right now, as an elected official, you can virtually say anything you want about me without any repercussions” unless “there is an explicit threat of violence.”

Mattice said there will be high turnover between now and the 2024 elections, but there will be no shortage of elected officials and administrative workers to man local elections.

“We also know that for the number of people who are leaving, the local jurisdictions will fill these positions with new people coming in,” he said. “You hope there is a transition period where the folks with all the knowledge can share” their institutional insights with those taking their places.

Wilcox worries about the motivations of those who are running for some Florida county elections supervisor seats in upcoming elections, predicting the state will have “for lack of a better word, a new crop of supervisors” more partisan than their predecessors in the office soon.

Mattice said there is a distinction between employees who work in county election offices and those who serve, often in volunteer capacities, as poll-watchers during elections.

Most elections workers “try very hard to be nonpartisan” and are committed professionals “not looking at party, but at putting out a fair, equitable process that people can have trust in,” he said, noting he has “not necessarily” seen a trend in partisans seeking employment in elections offices.

“Elections officials across the country work long hours and take a lot of abuse and don’t get paid a lot,” Mattice said. “We hope the people who are coming in are coming in for the right reasons. They are the gatekeepers of our democracy.”

John Haughey


You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...