Abortionists, which is a euphemistic way to say murderers, have really leaned into their infanticadal ways. Whereas safe, legal, and rare was the mantra in the not-so-distant past, the baby-killing movement really turned the corner recently.
The latest effort is in California, a state whose governor desired to be an abortion sanctuary in response to pro-life states restricting or outlawing the act altogether. If anyone ever wanted moral clarity on certain political ideologies and worldviews, let that sink in: California wants to be a sanctuary for infanticide.
For the left, though, nothing is ever enough. Not only do they want to facilitate women destroying babies in utero, now they want to ensure no woman gets punished for the death of their newborn baby in the aftermath of the birthing process. California Assembly Bill 2223 states the following:
“Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights under this article, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death due to a pregnancy-related cause.”
What could possibly be a pregnancy-related cause of perinatal death? Failed abortion? Extensive drug use or neglect of an unwanted child? The only thing worse than abortiuon as it stands is the thinking of a baby tediously dying from the agony of abuse, neglect, and hatred for day after day. The phrase “just when you thought it couldn’t get worse” pops into my head.
Since everyone is talking about this topic, one intrepid woman went to the dangerous Cali streets to ask locals what they thought of killing babies. What her interview reveals is disturbing:
This is so terrifying. So selfish. Kill a baby up to 7 days after birth? Not far enough for one guy, he says ten months!
May God have mercy on our nation. https://t.co/ObBEFgrg4u
— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) April 22, 2022
“So basically, if they have their baby, they can neglect them for seven days and if the baby dies then they can’t be held criminally liable. What do you think?
After the question, here come the answers:
“I think whatever, like, helps women, and helps them achieve their, like, dreams, and however that needs to, like, happen is definitely..acts to help that is helping all of us. So…”
I believe in freedom, but listening to murderous idiocacy strethces that limit sometimes. Could she have said “like” any more times than what she did? My gosh, form a thought.
“So I’d prefer most women make their decisions at eight weeks, but I am also in support of ten months out of the womb – if the mother wants to.”
Just for the record, this is the opposite of a man. Men defend women. Men protect the innocent. This spineless simp plays the leftist-taught card that forces so-called men to defer to women. Nope, just nope. Your number one job as a man is to protect and defend women and children. Start doing it.
“I think, fuck them kids, so, if like, you want to get a late-term abortion, like, that’s up to you. You know, I’ve had an abortion too and it was my choice and I’m happy I had that choice.”
Can you even be considered a person at this point? Fuck them kids? I can think of few things that remove one’s soul than committing to this line of thinking.
As the video ends, the woman-on-the-street interview goes in for the final question: Would you get an abortion again? Predictably, the answer is not just a regrettable yes, but rather an enthusiastic yes.
“Yes. 100%. 100 Times, I’d do it multiple times. Until I feel that I’m ready to parent.”